/
Vendor was underpaid in the payroll
Vendor was underpaid in the payroll
- Knowledge Assistant
Owned by Knowledge Assistant
Description of Issue
On the vendor proof, a negative amount is showing for an employee and as a result the vendor was underpaid for the other employees amount
Context
- Munis
- Payroll
- Payroll Processing
- Vendor Processing
Cause
Site had processed a vendor void in a previous payroll that was deferred to this warrant so it came in with a negative amount as it was not permanently deferred
Resolution
Since the vendor was underpaid for the other employees deduction amount, an AP will need to be cut to pay the different
Additional Information
The negative amount should come in from the previous warrant as a safeguard so that the vendor is not overpaid
, multiple selections available,
Related content
Negative Vendor Payment from Void Warrant Not in Vendor Processing in Regular Payroll
Negative Vendor Payment from Void Warrant Not in Vendor Processing in Regular Payroll
More like this
Vendor amounts from Void Payroll did not generate into the next non-Void Payroll
Vendor amounts from Void Payroll did not generate into the next non-Void Payroll
More like this
Vendor amounts in regular payroll do not match void warrant
Vendor amounts in regular payroll do not match void warrant
More like this
Vendor Payment was removed instead of deferred
Vendor Payment was removed instead of deferred
More like this
Vendor Processing not showing negative and positive vendor amounts when amount is the same
Vendor Processing not showing negative and positive vendor amounts when amount is the same
More like this
Earnings and Deductions Proof Remaining Payroll Liabilities Total Invoices this payroll and Total Invoices other payrolls
Earnings and Deductions Proof Remaining Payroll Liabilities Total Invoices this payroll and Total Invoices other payrolls
More like this